Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is better than the LG V20's 77 global score. LG K92's body is much newer than LG V20's, although it is just a little thicker and heavier. The LG K92 has a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because it has more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM. LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG K92 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG K92 counts with a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG K92 features better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V20, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.