Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the LG V20, having an 82.5 score against 77. The LG V30S ThinQ design is newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than LG V20. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little better processing power than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper display than LG V20, because it has a bit higher pixel density, a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V20, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal memory.
LG V30S ThinQ and LG V20 feature incredibly similar cameras, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy LG V20, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.