Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than the LG V20, having a score of 87.6 against 77. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is incredibly newer than LG V20's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
LG V60 ThinQ has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The LG V60 ThinQ takes slightly better pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a camera in the back with a way better 64 megapixels resolution, a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ has a really longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG V20, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.