Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than LG V20's 77 global score. The LG Velvet is a incredibly newer device than the LG V20, but it is a little thicker and just a little heavier. The LG V20 counts with a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
LG Velvet has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 64 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
The LG Velvet features longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The LG Velvet shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Velvet also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Although LG Velvet is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.