Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than the LG V20, getting an 85.3 score against 77. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the LG V20. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little bit better looking display than LG V20, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels and a really bigger screen.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with just a little better processing power than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores. The LG V20 features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 4449mAh battery size. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a slightly better camera than LG V20, because although it has a much lower resolution camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V20, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.