Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than LG V20, with an 89.6 score against 77. The Motorola edge design is much newer than the LG V20's, although it's thicker and a bit heavier. The LG V20 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number per display inch.
Motorola edge counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola edge counts with a little faster processor than LG V20, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
Motorola edge shoots way better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Motorola edge also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
The Motorola edge has a superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Motorola edge, else you can save some money and buy the LG V20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.