Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is much better than LG V20's global score of 77. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design is notably newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than LG V20. The LG V20 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG V20 features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a way better battery life than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.