Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is just a bit better than LG V20, having a score of 84.7 against 77. Even though the Motorola Edge (2022) is a little bit thicker than LG V20, it's just a little bit lighter and much newer. Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit faster processor than LG V20, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The LG V20 features just a bit better display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The LG V20 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a really longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The Motorola Edge (2022) features a better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a back camera with a much higher resolution and higher video frame rates.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you want to save some money, you can get LG V20, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.