Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than LG V20, with a general score of 80.9 against 77. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is way newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the LG V20. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better display than LG V20, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
LG V20 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores. LG V20 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better camera than LG V20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.