Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a 77 score against 77. Although LG V20 is incredibly older and just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, it's body is still just a bit thinner. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a little sharper screen than LG V20, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The LG V20 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster). The LG V20 has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a superior battery life than LG V20, because it has a 56% bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a camera in the back with lot more MP and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.