Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than LG V20, having an 86.3 score against 77. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is newer than the LG V20, it is just a little thicker and just a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than LG V20, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel amount in each inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than LG V20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. LG V20 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores (but faster).
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera, a way bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.