Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than LG V20's global score of 77. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V20. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than LG V20, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen.
LG V20 has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM and 4 less cores (although they are faster). Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera with lot more megapixels, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way bigger sensor and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.