Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Smoke black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a bit better than Moto G Power, getting a 77 score against 76.1. Even though LG V20 is noticeably older than Moto G Power, it's design is lighter and thinner. The Moto G Power counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G Power also has more CPU cores (although slower).
The LG V20 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG V20 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G Power counts with a bit better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a back camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the same camera sensor size and the same video quality, the Moto G Power also has a larger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto G Power has a much better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V20 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.