Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the LG V20, with a overall score of 86.2 against 77. Moto G200 5G is a extremely newer device than LG V20, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V20 features a bit better display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen density.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better performance than LG V20, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG V20 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Moto G200 5G counts with a greater camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Moto G200 5G has a much better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.