Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. LG V20 is a just a bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z Force. The Moto Z Force has a bit sharper display than LG V20, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Moto Z Force also counts with a just a bit greater display density.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit better processor than LG V20. They have a Quad-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z Force's storage to install games and applications is very similar to LG V20's one, both of them have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force has just a little better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
LG V20 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.