Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a general score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the LG V20's score of 77. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's construction is newer, incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG V20. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit superior processor than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a larger number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little more vivid screen than LG V20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a bit greater pixel count in each inch of screen. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with as much storage for games and applications as the LG V20 one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V20 also has a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a larger aperture.
The LG V20 counts with superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.