Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is slightly better than LG V20, with a global score of 77.6 against 77. Motorola Moto Z3's body is newer, a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than LG V20. LG V20 has just a bit better display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit better performance than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a higher number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z3 has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the LG V20 one, both have equal internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 counts with a little longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG V20 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V20 also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Moto Z3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.