Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V20 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 77 against 76.3. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also an older, just a little thicker and heavier device. The LG V20 has a little bit better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with as much storage capacity for applications and games as the LG V20 one, both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z3 Play's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in LG V20, and although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a larger number of cores (but slower), they both have a 4 GB RAM.
The LG V20 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V20 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
The LG V20 features a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V20 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.