Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than LG V20, with a global score of 81.6 against 77. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than the LG V20. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a little bit better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a higher number of cores.
The LG V20 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
LG V20 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V20 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace has a way better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.