Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than LG V20's overall score of 77. The Motorola One Action design is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than the LG V20. LG V20 features a little sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola One Action counts with a bit better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Action also has a greater number of cores (and faster). The LG V20 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V20 also has a camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Action has a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Action has a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get LG V20, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.