Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the LG V20's overall score of 77. Motorola One Hyper is a newer phone than the LG V20, although it is thicker and heavier. The LG V20 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a little bit better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower).
The Motorola One Hyper features a superior camera than LG V20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.