Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is much better than LG V20's 77 score. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is noticeably newer, but just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than LG V20. The LG V20 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better processor than LG V20, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) features a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
The LG V20 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 14% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.