Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than LG V20's score of 77. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is extremely newer and way thinner than the LG V20's, but it's also somewhat heavier. The LG V20 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior storage to store more apps and games than LG V20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V20 has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and 12 GB less RAM.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.