Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V20 has an overall score of 77, which is a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The LG V20 construction is just a little bit thinner than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's just a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V20, because it has a little higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little bit larger display and a quite higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little better processing power than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores. LG V20 features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V20 has a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V20 also has a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size.
The LG V20 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.