Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 77 against 75.8. Despite of the fact that LG V20 is much older than nubia Red Magic 3S, it's construction is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner. The LG V20 counts with a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better display density.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a faster processing unit than LG V20, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM. The LG V20 features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot better camera than LG V20, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a way better resolution back camera, a bigger aperture and a lot better video quality. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V20 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.