Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A20s is a bit better than the LG V20, with a 77 score against 77. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A20s is way newer than LG V20, it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V20 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen pixels density and a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A20s counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the LG V20 one, and although the Galaxy A20s has a higher number of cores (but slower), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. LG V20 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A20s has improved battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG V20 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the LG V20 also has a lot bigger sensor, a more MP back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.