Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a bit better than the Galaxy A21, getting a 77 score against 76.1. The LG V20 body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy A21, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy A21 has a little bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster).
LG V20 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot better pixel density. The LG V20 features much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A21, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The LG V20 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A21, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and a same resolution camera, the LG V20 also has a way better video definition and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality. The Galaxy A21 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
LG V20 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.