Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has a general score of 84.6, which is slightly better than the LG V20's 77 score. The Galaxy A22 5G design is noticeably newer than the LG V20's, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. LG V20 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has more processing cores. LG V20 has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A22 5G takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a much better battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.