Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than LG V20's general score of 77. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is notably newer than LG V20, it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V20 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 4 less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better display than LG V20, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy A25 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.