Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 is just a bit better than LG V20, having a global score of 79.6 against 77. The Galaxy A30 body has the same thickness than the LG V20, but it is a little bit lighter. LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel density.
LG V20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 and the Samsung Galaxy A30 feature incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has a greater number of cores (although they are slower), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The LG V20 takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a 0.36 inches sensor and the same resolution camera, the LG V20 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. Samsung Galaxy A30 counts with improved battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.