Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30s is just a bit better than the LG V20, having a score of 79.8 against 77. Galaxy A30s is a a little bit lighter cellphone than LG V20, but they are 0.3inches thick. The LG V20 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way higher screen density.
Galaxy A30s has a processor that's just as good as the LG V20 one, and although the Galaxy A30s has more CPU cores (but slower), they both have the same RAM amount. LG V20 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A30s has longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh. The LG V20 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.