Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than LG V20, having a general score of 79.4 against 77. Galaxy A35 5G's body is much newer than the LG V20's, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. LG V20 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel number per inch in the display.
The LG V20 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 4 less cores and 2 GB less RAM.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much bigger back camera sensor and a back camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.