Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the LG V20, with a 79.6 score against 77. Galaxy A40 is a extremely newer and lighter cellphone than the LG V20, although it is also just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A40's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in LG V20, and although the Samsung Galaxy A40 has more cpu cores (although they are slower), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The LG V20 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A40, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a little higher amount of pixels in each display inch. The LG V20 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have a back facing camera with a 16 MP resolution and a 0.36 inches camera sensor, the LG V20 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG V20 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A40, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.