Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the LG V20, with an 83.8 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body has the same thickness than LG V20, but it's just a bit lighter. The LG V20 features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG V20 has a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50 has a little bit better processing power than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A50 also has a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy A50 features superior battery life than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a 0.36 inches back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with a much better resolution and a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Although Galaxy A50 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG V20, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.