Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than the LG V20, getting an 85.5 score against 77. Galaxy A51 is a way newer and a bit lighter phone than the LG V20, but it's just a little thicker. LG V20 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel density.
Galaxy A51 has a little faster processor than LG V20, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A51 also has 4 more cores. LG V20 counts with slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with greater battery life than LG V20, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 has a much better camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with much more MP.
Although Galaxy A51 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V20, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.