Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the LG V20's 77 overall score. Although the Galaxy A51 5G is much newer than the LG V20, it's somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. The LG V20 features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior processor than LG V20, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior camera than LG V20, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a much better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy A51 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.