Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than LG V20's 77 global score. The Galaxy A52 design is newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the LG V20. The LG V20 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The Galaxy A52 has a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than LG V20, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.