Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than LG V20, having a 91.3 score against 77. The Galaxy A52 5G body is notably newer than the LG V20's, but it's a little thicker and just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
LG V20 features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than LG V20, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots greater photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.