Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a global score of 77, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. LG V20 is an noticeably older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but LG could make it a bit thinner and a little lighter. LG V20 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V20 counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 features a little faster CPU than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
LG V20 captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in poorly lited environments, they both have a same size sensor, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V20 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.