Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the LG V20, getting a general score of 92.9 against 77. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is way newer than the LG V20, it is just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The LG V20 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little faster processor than LG V20, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way more megapixels camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG V20, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.