Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the LG V20, with a general score of 85.2 against 77. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a a lot newer device than the LG V20, although it's a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V20 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a lot higher 24 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The LG V20 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with greater battery life than LG V20, because it has a 3800mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.