Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-29 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro is slightly better than the LG V20, getting a 78.4 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's design is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than LG V20, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. LG V20 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V20 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
LG V20 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy C7 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy C7 Pro also has a larger number of faster cores.
The Galaxy C7 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3 percent more battery size. LG V20 captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 MP resolution, the LG V20 also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.