Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than LG V20's 77 general score. Although Galaxy F62 is way newer than the LG V20, it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit better processor than LG V20, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Galaxy F62 takes a lot better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.