Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG V20, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a way newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than LG V20, but it is noticeably heavier. LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixels density.
The Galaxy Fold features just a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores. Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you want to save some money, you can get LG V20, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.