Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than LG V20's 77 score. Galaxy M20's body is incredibly newer than the LG V20's, although it is thicker and just a bit heavier. The LG V20 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The LG V20 and the Galaxy M20 count with very similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy M20 has a larger number of cores (but slower), they both have the same RAM amount. The LG V20 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture, a more megapixels back camera and a bigger sensor.
LG V20 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M20 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.