Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than LG V20, with a global score of 87.7 against 77. Galaxy M51's body is extremely newer than LG V20's, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V20 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy M51 features a bit superior processor than LG V20, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V20 has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 features a much better battery life than LG V20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.