Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than LG V20's 77 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is way newer than LG V20's, but it is heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than LG V20, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit bigger memory for applications and games than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher video definition, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some money and get the LG V20, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.