Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than LG V20, having an 81.2 score against 77. Despite of the fact Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than the LG V20, it's construction is still a little lighter. Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better looking display than LG V20, although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a much worse display density, they both have a screen of the same size.
The LG V20 has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an extra GPU.
The LG V20 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V20 also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs, a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
The LG V20 and the Galaxy Note 3 have similar battery performance.
Although Galaxy Note 3 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.