Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than LG V20, having an 89 score against 77. Although the Galaxy Note10 is just a little bit thicker than the LG V20, it's a little lighter and newer. The Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V20 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The LG V20 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG V20, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a larger aperture.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.