Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than LG V20, having a 77.7 score against 77. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note3 is notably older and just a little bit thicker than LG V20, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit better processing power than LG V20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V20 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V20 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher screen pixels density. LG V20 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG V20 also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, a bigger camera aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V20 counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note3's battery lifetime is just as good as the LG V20 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.